An educator, sociologist, employer and moderator examine six invented work-sample results for two apprenticeship places. A published tie rule settles selection while eight supervision hours expose a continuing trade-off between preparation and support.
01Read the Arabic conversation
مُنَاقَشَةُ حُدُودِ الِاخْتِيَارِ عَلَى أَسَاسِ الْجَدَارَةِ
عَادِلٌ: فِي وَرْشَتِنَا الْمُتَخَيَّلَةِ مَقْعَدَانِ لِلتَّدْرِيبِ عَلَى إِعْدَادِ بَطَاقَاتِ الْمَعَارِضِ. اِخْتَبَرْنَا سِتَّةَ مُتَقَدِّمِينَ فِي أَرْبَعِينَ دَقِيقَةً: سِتُّ نِقَاطٍ لِتَصْحِيحِ مَعْلُومَاتٍ، وَأَرْبَعٌ لِإِنْجَازِ خَانَاتِ التَّنْسِيقِ. فَمَا نَمْنَحُهُ اِسْمَ الْجَدَارَةِ؟
رَنَا: هَذِهِ أَرْقَامٌ مُخْتَلَقَةٌ لِحَالَتِنَا. أَفَادَ اثْنَانِ بِتَوَفُّرِ أَدَوَاتِ تَدْرِيبٍ مُنْتَظَمٍ لَدَيْهِمَا، وَحَصَلَا عَلَى تِسْعٍ وَثَمَانٍ. وَأَفَادَ الْأَرْبَعَةُ الْآخَرُونَ بِعَدَمِ تَوَفُّرِهَا، وَحَصَلُوا عَلَى ثَمَانٍ وَسَبْعٍ وَسِتٍّ وَسِتٍّ.
لَيْلَى: نَشَرْنَا الْوَزْنَيْنِ قَبْلَ الِاخْتِبَارِ، وَقُلْنَا إِنَّ التَّعَادُلَ يُحْسَمُ بِعَدَدِ التَّصْحِيحَاتِ. أَحْتَاجُ إِلَى بَطَاقَاتٍ دَقِيقَةٍ تَصِلُ فِي مَوْعِدِهَا؛ فَالْإِنْجَازُ لَيْسَ زِينَةً فِي الْمِعْيَارِ. لَكِنَّ مَكَانَيْنِ لِلتَّدْرِيبِ لَيْسَا وَظِيفَتَيْنِ لِخَبِيرَيْنِ.
كَمَالٌ: إِذَنْ لَدَيْنَا أَدَاءٌ مُنْجَزٌ، وَحَاجَةٌ إِلَى التَّعَلُّمِ، وَتَارِيخٌ مُخْتَلِفٌ لِلْفُرَصِ. هَلْ يَثْبُتُ مِنَ التَّرْتِيبِ مَنْ كَانَ أَفْضَلَ فِي هَذِهِ الْمُهِمَّةِ، أَمْ مَنْ يَسْتَحِقُّ الْفُرْصَةَ مِنْ جَمِيعِ الْوُجُوهِ؟
عَادِلٌ: صَاحِبُ الثَّمَانِي بِلَا أَدَوَاتٍ صَحَّحَ الْمَعْلُومَاتِ السِّتَّ، وَأَنْجَزَ خَانَتَيْنِ. وَصَاحِبُ الثَّمَانِي مَعَ الْأَدَوَاتِ صَحَّحَ أَرْبَعًا وَأَنْجَزَ الْخَانَاتِ الْأَرْبَعَ. الْمَجْمُوعُ وَاحِدٌ، وَلَكِنَّ الْحَاجَةَ إِلَى التَّدْرِيبِ مُخْتَلِفَةٌ. لَا يُخْبِرُنَا الْعَدَدُ وَحْدَهُ بِمَا يَجِبُ تَعْلِيمُهُ.
رَنَا: وَتَفَاوُتُ الْوُصُولِ يَفْتَحُ سُؤَالًا عَنْ تَكَوُّنِ الْأَدَاءِ، لَا يُعْطِينَا مِقْدَارَ أَثَرِهِ. لَمْ نُغَيِّرْ الْفُرَصَ ثُمَّ نُعِدِ الْمُهِمَّةَ. لَوْ قُلْتُ إِنَّ الْأَدَوَاتِ صَنَعَتْ كُلَّ فَرْقٍ، لَتَجَاوَزْتُ مَا تُظْهِرُهُ هَذِهِ الْحَالَةُ الصَّغِيرَةُ.
لَيْلَى: وَفْقَ قَاعِدَتِنَا، يَأْخُذُ صَاحِبُ التِّسْعِ الْمَقْعَدَ الْأَوَّلَ، وَيَأْخُذُ صَاحِبُ التَّصْحِيحَاتِ السِّتَّةِ الثَّانِيَ. لَا أَنْسُبُ سُرْعَتَهُمَا الْمُسْتَقْبَلِيَّةَ إِلَى الْمَجْمُوعِ؛ إِنَّمَا أَطْلُبُ الِالْتِزَامَ بِقَاعِدَةٍ أَعْلَنَّاهَا. الْفُرْصَةُ الثَّانِيَةُ تَذْهَبُ هُنَا إِلَى مَنْ أَفَادَ بِقِلَّةِ الْوُصُولِ.
كَمَالٌ: تَطْبِيقُ قَاعِدَةِ التَّعَادُلِ يَحْسِمُ الِاخْتِيَارَ الْحَالِيَّ، وَلَا يَحْسِمُ جَوْدَةَ الْقَاعِدَةِ لِكُلِّ غَرَضٍ. إِذَا سَمَّيْنَا الْمُخْتَارَيْنِ الْأَجْدَرَيْنِ، فَلْنُبَيِّنْ بِأَيِّ مَعْنًى: أَعْلَى تَرْتِيبٍ فِي مِعْيَارِنَا، أَمْ أَقَلُّ حَاجَةٍ إِلَى التَّعَلُّمِ؟
عَادِلٌ: مَنْ لَمْ يَجِدْ أَدَوَاتٍ لَا يَدْخُلُ الْمُهِمَّةَ بِالتَّارِيخِ نَفْسِهِ. لَكِنَّ الِاعْتِرَافَ بِذَلِكَ لَا يَجْعَلُ تَصْحِيحَهُ النَّاقِصَ كَامِلًا. أَقْبَلُ الِاخْتِيَارَ الْحَالِيَّ، وَأَعْتَرِضُ عَلَى تَصْوِيرِ غَيْرِ الْمُخْتَارِينَ كَأَنَّهُمْ لَمْ يُحَاوِلُوا، لِأَنَّنَا لَمْ نَقِسْ مُحَاوَلَاتِهِمْ.
رَنَا: وَلَا نَعْرِفُ مِنْ هَذِهِ الْأَرْقَامِ أَنْسَابَهُمْ أَوْ دُخُولَ أُسَرِهِمْ أَوْ أَسْبَابَ قِلَّةِ الْوُصُولِ. لَا يُرَخِّصُ لَنَا ذَلِكَ أَنْ نَسْتَعِيرَ قِصَّةً جَاهِزَةً عَنْ كُلِّ وَاحِدٍ. الْمَعْلُومُ أَضْيَقُ مِنَ التَّفْسِيرِ الْمُغْرِي.
لَيْلَى: أَمَامِي ثَمَانِي سَاعَاتٍ لِلْإِشْرَافِ فِي الْأُسْبُوعِ الْأَوَّلِ، لِلْمُتَدَرِّبَيْنِ مَعًا. صَاحِبُ التِّسْعِ أَيْضًا تَرَكَ تَصْحِيحًا، وَصَاحِبُ الثَّمَانِي يَحْتَاجُ إِلَى التَّنْسِيقِ. الْمِعْيَارُ يَخْتَارُ، وَلَا يَرْسُمُ خُطَّةَ التَّعَلُّمِ.
كَمَالٌ: هَذَا يُضِيفُ حَدًّا آخَرَ لِلْمَجْمُوعِ: التَّرْتِيبُ لَا يَصِفُ تَوْزِيعَ الْمُسَانَدَةِ. أَتُرِيدُ يَا عَادِلُ زِيَادَةَ مَقْعَدٍ، أَمْ تَغْيِيرَ اِسْتِخْدَامِ السَّاعَاتِ الثَّمَانِي؟ لَا نَتْرُكُ كُلْفَتَهَا مَخْفِيَّةً عِنْدَ لَيْلَى.
عَادِلٌ: لَا أَقْتَرِحُ مَقْعَدًا ثَالِثًا الْيَوْمَ. أَقْتَرِحُ خَمْسَ سَاعَاتٍ لِلتَّنْسِيقِ مَعَ صَاحِبِ الثَّمَانِي، وَثَلَاثًا لِمُرَاجَعَةِ الْمَعْلُومَاتِ مَعَ صَاحِبِ التِّسْعِ. نَسْتَجِيبُ لِنَوْعِ النَّقْصِ، وَلَا نَعِدُ بِأَنَّ خَمْسًا سَتَجْعَلُهُ سَرِيعًا بِمَا يَكْفِي.
رَنَا: وَيَبْقَى اِحْتِمَالُ أَنْ يَتَعَلَّمَ أَحَدُهُمَا أَسْرَعَ مِنْ تَقْدِيرِنَا أَوْ أَبْطَأَ. لَيْسَ اخْتِلَافُ الْبِدَايَةِ حُكْمًا عَلَى نِهَايَةِ التَّعَلُّمِ. نَسْتَخْدِمُ الْعَيِّنَةَ لِتَوْجِيهِ الْإِشْرَافِ، وَلَا نَجْعَلُهَا وَصْفًا دَائِمًا لِقُدْرَةِ شَخْصٍ أَوْ مَجْمُوعَةٍ.
لَيْلَى: أَقْبَلُ تَوْزِيعَ الْخَمْسِ وَالثَّلَاثِ لِلْأُسْبُوعِ الْأَوَّلِ، وَلَكِنْ يَبْقَى عَلَيَّ تَدْقِيقُ الْبَطَاقَاتِ قَبْلَ تَسْلِيمِهَا. هَذَا وَقْتٌ مَحْجُوزٌ مِنْ عَمَلِي، وَلَا أُسَمِّيهِ كُلْفَةً اخْتَفَتْ لِأَنَّنَا اخْتَرْنَا بِنِيَّةٍ حَسَنَةٍ. سَنُرَاجِعُ الْمَهَامَّ بِحَسَبِ الْعَمَلِ الْفِعْلِيِّ.
كَمَالٌ: تَمَّ اخْتِيَارُ الْمُتَدَرِّبَيْنِ بِالْقَاعِدَةِ الْمَنْشُورَةِ، وَحُدِّدَ إِشْرَافُ الْأُسْبُوعِ الْأَوَّلِ. بَقِيَ سُؤَالُ الدَّوْرَةِ الْمُقْبِلَةِ: هَلْ نُخَصِّصُ وَقْتًا قَبْلَ الِاخْتِبَارِ لِمَنْ لَا يَجِدُونَ أَدَوَاتٍ؟ لِنُبَيِّنْ كُلْفَتَهُ قَبْلَ إِعْلَانِهِ.
عَادِلٌ: أُفَضِّلُ إِتَاحَةَ تَدْرِيبٍ مُشْتَرَكٍ قَبْلَ الِاخْتِبَارِ الْمُقْبِلِ. لِأَنَّ الْفُرَصَ تَسْبِقُ الْقِيَاسَ، فَإِنَّ تَوْحِيدَ وَرَقَةِ الْمُهِمَّةِ لَا يُوَحِّدُ التَّارِيخَ الَّذِي يَدْخُلُ بِهِ الْمُتَقَدِّمُونَ. لَا أَضْمَنُ زَوَالَ الْفُرُوقِ، وَلَا أَشْتَرِطُ نَتَائِجَ مُتَسَاوِيَةً.
رَنَا: وَحَتَّى التَّدْرِيبُ الْمُشْتَرَكُ يَحْتَاجُ إِلَى سُؤَالِ الْوُصُولِ: هَلْ يَسْتَطِيعُ الْمُتَقَدِّمُونَ حُضُورَهُ فِي الْمَوْعِدِ نَفْسِهِ؟ لِنَسْأَلْهُمْ قَبْلَ اخْتِيَارِ الْمَوْعِدِ، حَتَّى لَا نَسْتَبْدِلَ عَائِقًا بِآخَرَ.
لَيْلَى: مَا نَسْتَطِيعُ تَخْصِيصَهُ لِلدَّوْرَةِ الْمُقْبِلَةِ هُوَ ثَمَانِي سَاعَاتِ إِشْرَافٍ أَيْضًا، قَبْلَ الِاخْتِيَارِ أَوْ بَعْدَهُ. إِذَا ذَهَبَتْ كُلُّهَا إِلَى التَّدْرِيبِ الْمُشْتَرَكِ، فَسَيَبْدَأُ الْمُخْتَارُونَ دُونَ الْإِشْرَافِ الْمُخَصَّصِ الْآنَ. لَا نَمْلِكُ سَاعَاتٍ إِضَافِيَّةً فِي خُطَّتِنَا.
كَمَالٌ: هَذَا تَعَارُضٌ فِي اِسْتِخْدَامِ وَقْتٍ مَحْدُودٍ، لَا تَعَارُضٌ بَيْنَ شَخْصٍ يَهْتَمُّ بِالْعَدْلِ وَآخَرَ يَرْفُضُهُ. نُقَارِنُ تَوْسِيعَ فُرْصَةِ الِاسْتِعْدَادِ بِمُسَانَدَةِ مَنْ سَيَبْدَأُ الْعَمَلَ. هَلْ يُمْكِنُ تَقْسِيمُ السَّاعَاتِ، وَمَا الَّذِي سَنَخْسَرُهُ فِي كُلِّ جَانِبٍ؟
عَادِلٌ: قَدْ نَقْسِمُهَا، لَكِنَّ تَوْزِيعَ الْخَمْسِ وَالثَّلَاثِ الْحَالِيَّ لَا يُجِيبُ عَنْ ذَلِكَ. هُنَا نُعَلِّمُ شَخْصَيْنِ، وَقَبْلَ الِاخْتِبَارِ قَدْ يَحْضُرُ سِتَّةٌ. لَا أَسْتَطِيعُ أَنْ أَعِدَ بِالْفَائِدَةِ نَفْسِهَا لِكُلِّ وَاحِدٍ، وَأَنَا أُوَزِّعُ الْوَقْتَ عَلَى عَدَدٍ أَكْبَرَ.
رَنَا: وَالْعَيِّنَةُ الْحَالِيَّةُ لَا تَحْسِمُ أَيَّ تَوْزِيعٍ سَيَكُونُ أَفْضَلَ. يَلْزَمُ وَصْفُ مَا يُمْكِنُ تَعْلِيمُهُ فِي الْوَقْتِ الْمُتَاحِ. يَظَلُّ اخْتِلَافُ الْوُصُولِ سَبَبًا لِفَحْصِ الْفُرْصَةِ، وَيَظَلُّ الْأَدَاءُ الْمُنْجَزُ مَعْلُومَةً لِلْعَمَلِ؛ لَا تُلْغِي إِحْدَاهُمَا الْأُخْرَى.
لَيْلَى: سَأَكْتُبُ فِي خِطَابِ الْقَبُولِ أَنَّ الِاخْتِيَارَ تَمَّ بِحَسَبِ الْمِعْيَارِ الْمُعْلَنِ، لَا أَنَّ الْمُخْتَارَيْنِ أَفْضَلُ مِنْ غَيْرِهِمَا فِي كُلِّ شَيْءٍ. وَفِي خِطَابِ الرَّفْضِ سَأَذْكُرُ النَّتِيجَةَ، دُونَ أَنْ أَنْسُبَ إِلَى صَاحِبِهَا قِلَّةَ الْجُهْدِ.
كَمَالٌ: لِنَحْفَظْ هَذَا الْحَدَّ فِي الْمَحْضَرِ. الْقَاعِدَةُ تُرَتِّبُ أَدَاءً تَحْتَ شُرُوطٍ مُعَيَّنَةٍ، وَلَا تَزِنُ قِيمَةَ أَصْحَابِهِ. وَمُرَاجَعَةُ الْفُرَصِ لَا تَتَطَلَّبُ مُسَاوَاةَ النَّتَائِجِ، بَلْ تُلْزِمُنَا بِبَيَانِ مَا تَسْتَطِيعُ الْوَرْشَةُ إِتَاحَتَهُ وَمَا تُضَحِّي بِهِ.
عَادِلٌ: لَنْ أَصِفَ الْمَقْعَدَ الثَّانِيَ بِأَنَّهُ مُجَامَلَةٌ لِمَنْ قَلَّتْ فُرَصُهُ؛ قَدْ كَسَبَهُ بِقَاعِدَةِ التَّعَادُلِ. وَلَنْ أَجْعَلَ قَبُولَهُ دَلِيلًا عَلَى زَوَالِ الْعَائِقِ. سَأَصِفُ تَدْرِيبًا قَبْلَ الِاخْتِبَارِ، بِسَاعَاتِنَا نَفْسِهَا.
رَنَا: وَسَأُبْقِي الْأَرْقَامَ مَنْسُوبَةً إِلَى مُتَقَدِّمِي هَذِهِ الْحَالَةِ الْمُخْتَلَقَةِ. لَا تُثْبِتُ نَتِيجَةُ السِّتَّةِ أَنَّ كُلَّ نِظَامِ اخْتِيَارٍ يُنْصِفُ النَّاسَ أَوْ يَظْلِمُهُمْ. هِيَ تَجْعَلُنَا نَرَى فَرْقًا بَيْنَ مَا يَقِيسُهُ الِاخْتِبَارُ وَمَا نَطْلُبُ مِنْهُ أَنْ يُبَرِّرَهُ.
لَيْلَى: سَأَبْدَأُ بِالْمُخْتَارَيْنِ وَبِالسَّاعَاتِ الْمُتَّفَقِ عَلَيْهَا، وَسَأُحَافِظُ عَلَى مَوْعِدِ الْبَطَاقَاتِ. لَا أَضْمَنُ أَنَّ الْخُطَّةَ سَتَكْفِي، وَلَا أَقْبَلُ أَنْ يُعَدَّ الْمَوْعِدُ غَيْرَ مُهِمٍّ. تَحْتَاجُ الْوَرْشَةُ إِلَى عَمَلٍ وَتَعَلُّمٍ مَعًا.
كَمَالٌ: حُسِمَ اخْتِيَارُ هَذِهِ الدَّوْرَةِ، وَبَقِيَ تَوْزِيعُ سَاعَاتِ الدَّوْرَةِ الْمُقْبِلَةِ غَيْرَ مَحْسُومٍ. لَمْ نَخْتَرْ بَيْنَ الْمَهَارَةِ وَالْفُرْصَةِ كَأَنَّ إِحْدَاهُمَا وَهْمٌ؛ نُوَاجِهُ كُلْفَةَ تَوْسِيعِ الِاسْتِعْدَادِ مَعَ بَقَاءِ حَاجَةِ الْعَمَلِ إِلَى الْإِشْرَافِ وَالْإِنْجَازِ فِي وَقْتِهِ.
Show English translationHide English translation
Adil — educator: Our invented workshop has two apprenticeship places for preparing exhibition labels. We tested six applicants in forty minutes: six points for correcting information and four for completing layout boxes. What do we give the name merit?
Rana — sociologist: These numbers are invented for our case. Two reported having regular access to practice tools and scored nine and eight. The other four reported not having that access and scored eight, seven, six and six.
Layla — employer: We published both weights before the test and stated that ties would be resolved by the number of corrections. I need accurate labels delivered on time, so completion is not decorative in the criterion. But two apprenticeship places are not two jobs for experts.
Kamal — moderator: Then we have demonstrated performance, a need to learn, and different histories of opportunity. Does the ranking establish who was better at this task, or who deserves the opportunity in every respect?
Adil — educator: The applicant scoring eight without tools corrected all six items of information and completed two boxes. The one scoring eight with tools corrected four and completed all four boxes. The total is the same, but their training needs differ. The number alone does not tell us what needs teaching.
Rana — sociologist: Unequal access opens a question about how performance developed; it does not give us the size of its effect. We have not changed opportunities and repeated the task. If I said tools created every difference, I would exceed what this small case shows.
Layla — employer: Under our rule, the applicant with nine takes the first place, and the one with six corrections takes the second. I do not infer their future speed from the total; I am asking us to follow a rule we announced. The second opportunity here goes to someone who reported limited access.
Kamal — moderator: Applying the tie rule settles the current selection without settling the rule’s quality for every purpose. If we call those selected the most meritorious, let us specify in what sense: highest ranked under our criterion, or least in need of learning?
Adil — educator: Someone who lacked tools does not enter the task with the same history. But recognising that does not make an incomplete correction complete. I accept the current selection and object to depicting those not selected as if they had not tried, because we did not measure their efforts.
Rana — sociologist: These numbers do not tell us their family backgrounds, household incomes or reasons for limited access. That does not license borrowing a ready-made story about each person. What we know is narrower than the tempting explanation.
Layla — employer: I have eight supervision hours in the first week for the two apprentices together. The applicant with nine also missed a correction, while the one with eight needs layout practice. The criterion selects; it does not draw up a learning plan.
Kamal — moderator: This adds another limit to the total: the ranking does not describe how support is distributed. Adil, do you want to add a place or change the use of the eight hours? Let us not leave its cost hidden with Layla.
Adil — educator: I am not proposing a third place today. I propose five hours of layout work with the applicant scoring eight and three hours of reviewing information with the one scoring nine. We respond to the kind of gap, rather than promising that five hours will make the former fast enough.
Rana — sociologist: Either may still learn faster or slower than our estimate. A different starting point is not a judgment about the end of learning. We use the work sample to guide supervision without turning it into a permanent description of a person’s or group’s ability.
Layla — employer: I accept the five-and-three allocation for the first week, but I still have to check labels before delivery. This is time reserved from my work, and I do not call it a cost that vanished because we selected with good intentions. We will review tasks according to actual work.
Kamal — moderator: The apprentices have been selected under the published rule, and first-week supervision has been allocated. The next intake’s question remains: should we set aside time before the test for people without access to tools? Let us explain its cost before announcing it.
Adil — educator: I favour shared practice before the next test. Because opportunities precede measurement, standardising the task sheet does not standardise the history applicants bring to it. I do not guarantee the disappearance of differences, nor do I require equal results.
Rana — sociologist: Even shared practice needs an access question: can applicants attend at the same time? Let us ask them before choosing the time, so that we do not replace one obstacle with another.
Layla — employer: For the next intake we can allocate eight supervision hours too, either before or after selection. If all go to shared practice, those selected will begin without the supervision allocated now. We have no additional hours in our plan.
Kamal — moderator: This is a conflict over using limited time, not between someone who cares about fairness and someone who rejects it. We compare widening preparation opportunities with supporting those who will start work. Can the hours be divided, and what would we lose on each side?
Adil — educator: We may divide them, but the current five-and-three allocation does not answer that. Here we teach two people, while six may attend before the test. I cannot promise the same benefit to each person while distributing the time across a larger number.
Rana — sociologist: The current sample does not settle which allocation would be better. We need to describe what can be taught in the available time. Unequal access remains a reason to examine opportunity, and demonstrated performance remains information for the work; neither cancels the other.
Layla — employer: In the acceptance letter I will write that selection followed the announced criterion, rather than that those selected are better than everyone else at everything. In the rejection letter I will state the result without attributing insufficient effort to its recipient.
Kamal — moderator: Let us retain that boundary in the record. The rule ranks performance under particular conditions, rather than weighing people’s worth. Reviewing opportunities does not require equal results; it requires explaining what the workshop can provide and what it gives up.
Adil — educator: I will not describe the second place as a favour to someone with fewer opportunities: he earned it under the tie rule. Nor will I make his acceptance evidence that the obstacle has disappeared. I will describe pre-test practice using our same hours.
Rana — sociologist: I will keep the figures attributed to the applicants in this invented case. Six people’s results do not establish that every selection system treats people fairly or unfairly. They help us see a difference between what a test measures and what we ask it to justify.
Layla — employer: I will start with those selected and the agreed hours, keeping the labels’ deadline. I do not guarantee the plan will suffice, and I do not accept treating the deadline as unimportant. The workshop needs both work and learning.
Kamal — moderator: This intake’s selection is settled, while the next intake’s allocation of hours remains undecided. We have not chosen between skill and opportunity as if one were an illusion; we face the cost of widening preparation alongside the work’s continuing need for supervision and timely completion.
02Useful words and expressions
| Arabic in the conversation | Meaning here |
|---|---|
| اِسْمَ الْجَدَارَةِ | the name merit |
| يَحْسِمُ الِاخْتِيَارَ الْحَالِيَّ | settles the current selection |
| أَفَادَ بِقِلَّةِ الْوُصُولِ | reported limited access |
| كَأَنَّهُمْ لَمْ يُحَاوِلُوا | as if they had not tried |
| التَّفْسِيرِ الْمُغْرِي | the tempting explanation |
| تَوْزِيعَ الْمُسَانَدَةِ | the distribution of support |
| كُلْفَتَهَا مَخْفِيَّةً | its cost hidden |
| لِنَوْعِ النَّقْصِ | to the kind of gap |
| وَصْفًا دَائِمًا | a permanent description |
| عَائِقًا بِآخَرَ | one obstacle with another |
| تَزِنُ قِيمَةَ أَصْحَابِهِ | weighs the worth of those who produced it |
| مُجَامَلَةٌ لِمَنْ قَلَّتْ فُرَصُهُ | a favour to someone with fewer opportunities |
03Check your understanding
Choose one answer for each question. Look back at the Arabic conversation for evidence. Open the English question support or a hint when you need help.
What to remember
- A published score can rank demonstrated performance without establishing effort, personal worth or how opportunity caused the result.
- Use score components to plan supervision, and preserve operational deadlines alongside opportunities to learn.
- Wider preparation and support after selection compete for the same hours; one fictional case cannot resolve every selection system.
Explore the Arabic in this conversation
Related grammar and vocabularyOpen Araqick guides connected to this conversation.
Laysa in Arabic: Is Not and Is Not Here
فَالْإِنْجَازُ لَيْسَ زِينَةً فِي الْمِعْيَارِ
Use laysa to negate a nominal description of completion, preserving the employer’s reason for measuring it.
Because in Arabic: Give a Reason with Lianna
لِأَنَّ الْفُرَصَ تَسْبِقُ الْقِيَاسَ
Follow lianna with the accusative plural al-furasa to explain why a common task sheet does not equalise prior opportunities.
Fa in Arabic Conditional Sentences: When the Result Needs Fa
إِذَا ذَهَبَتْ كُلُّهَا إِلَى التَّدْرِيبِ الْمُشْتَرَكِ، فَسَيَبْدَأُ الْمُخْتَارُونَ دُونَ الْإِشْرَافِ الْمُخَصَّصِ الْآنَ
Connect an idha condition to a future consequence with fa plus sa-, showing the cost of allocating all hours before selection.
